Q1: Are there mechanical devices to reduce physiotherapist strain during sit-to-stand assistance? Why aren’t they used more?

 

A1: In hospitals, hoists help transfer patients between surfaces (e.g., bed to chair) but don’t assist sit-to-stand directly. Some chair-mounted devices may exist, but they’re not always practical for therapeutic training, where speed and active patient effort are prioritized. Limited availability and time constraints also limit their use.

​

Q2: Does your approach change with taller/heavier patients during transfers?

A2: We don’t "carry" patients due to safety policies. For larger patients needing maximal assistance, we avoid manual lifts and may use a standing tilt table (transfer from bed to an adjustable table tilted upright) or enlist extra help. Seated-to-standing transfers may be skipped if unsafe.

 

Q3: This standing to the table is like total assistance, where it's like the person just sit on the table, then they just automatically move the machine?

A3: No, it's not like a chair, it's like a piece of a bed or a flat surface. And then you just tilt them. So it doesn't go into standing.

​

Q4: How does the sit-to-stand method differ for stroke, orthopedic, and elderly patients?

 

A4:

• Stroke patients: Focus on compensating for one-sided weakness (e.g., supporting the weaker limb/trunk while the stronger side propels movement).

• Elderly (frail/deconditioned): Assist with overall weakness (e.g., aiding both legs, emphasizing thigh/core strength loss). May overlap with stroke if present.

• Orthopedic (e.g., post-op knees/hips): Pain and fear of movement are primary barriers; support focuses on pain management and confidence-building.

​

Q5: What are the main muscle groups trained during sit-to-stand, and how can we provide mechanical support without hindering patient effort?

A5: Key Muscle Groups:

• Hip/Knee Extensors (glutes, quadriceps) for rising

• Ankle Dorsiflexors/Plantarflexors for forward momentum and stability

• Core/Trunk Stabilizers to control forward lean

Biomechanics:

• Starting Position: Feet properly placed (not too far forward/back)

• Movement Phases: Forward trunk lean (momentum) → push through legs (extension of hips/knees/ankles)

Mechanical Support Options:

• Adjustable Chair Height (higher seats reduce effort)

• Firm Surface (softer surfaces like sofas increase difficulty)

• Armrests (allow patients to assist with upper body)

• Partial Support Devices (e.g., overhead lift straps, sit-to-stand aids) that assist without fully replacing patient effort

Considerations:

• Avoid over-supporting to preserve therapeutic muscle activation.

• Chair design (height, firmness, armrests) significantly impacts independence.

​​

Q6: What devices (other than hoists/tilt tables) are commonly used for gait/balance exercises?

A6:

• Walking Aids: Standard or automated walkers, ceiling-mounted body weight support systems (for treadmill/overground gait training)

• Exoskeletons: Knee-assist devices for pain reduction during movement

• Pedal Bikes: Portable pedal exercisers for lower limb mobility

• Resistance Tools: Bands, weights, or devices like "Gymonic" for home-based strength training

For Home Use: Focus on simple, accessible tools (resistance bands, pedal bikes) to help seniors/stroke patients maintain strength and mobility independently.

​

Q7: How do you ensure patients adhere to home exercise plans?

A7: Patient adherence is challenging but key factors include:

• Personal Relevance – Exercises must align with the patient’s goals and preferences. If they don’t see value, they won’t do it.

• Enjoyment & Ease – Equipment/exercises should be user-friendly and engaging.

• Discipline & Motivation – Self-driven patients are more likely to comply.

• Clear Purpose – Patients must understand why the exercises matter for their recovery/function.

​

Q8: How do you track and document patient recovery progress?

A8: We use a mix of objective measurements and patient-reported feedback:

• Objective Measures:

  • Functional Tests:

    • 30-Second Sit-to-Stand (repetitions measure leg strength/endurance)

    • 10-Meter Walk Test (gait speed)

    • Stair Climbing (mobility assessment)

  • Strength Testing: Handheld dynamometer for muscle strength tracking.

• Patient Self-Reporting:

  • Feedback on daily function (e.g., "I can now get up from bed/toilet independently").

• Adherence Tracking:

  • Exercise Diaries (simple tick-box logs)

  • Video Comparisons (caregivers film movements for visual progress proof)

• Why It Works:

  • Combines data-driven metrics (reps, speed, strength) with qualitative feedback.

  • Video documentation helps patients see improvements, boosting motivation.

​

Q9: Do large transfer machines (with straps) include monitoring systems to measure patient strength?

A9:

Current Machines: Primarily for safe transfers/mobility (no strength monitoring).

Alternative Tracking:

• Research uses accelerometers (step counting).

• Clinics rely on functional tests (e.g., 5x sit-to-stand, balance, gait speed).

• Tech Solutions: Apps (e.g., Korea’s SPPB tool) combine tests (balance, sit-to-stand, gait) into one scored system for efficiency.

​

Q10: Can AI analyze patient movement videos?

 

A10:

Yes! AI could help by:

• Automating gait analysis (frontal/side/back views)

• Tracking progress with simple visual reports for patients

• Using wearable sensors for easy, real-time feedback

​​

Q11: Is a physiotherapist present during walking/gait exercises? What support is provided?

 

A11:

• Minimal Assistance Needed: Patients use parallel bars for hand support.

• Independent Patients: Practice near walls for safety (can grab if unbalanced).

• Structured Training: Environment is set up (e.g., straight-line walking) to challenge balance safely.

• Ideal Support: Equipment that helps balance training while ensuring safety.

​​

Q12: Can we create a system to support patients during walking practice (e.g., auto-adjusting chair/safety catch)?

 

A12:

Yes! A smart support system would help when:

• Patients suddenly need to sit (fatigue/balance loss)

• Therapists/assistants work alone (extra safety layer)

Key Features Needed:

• Automatic chair positioning

• Fall prevention/catch mechanism

• Lightweight & easy to use

Why It Matters: Reduces therapist strain while keeping patients safe during independent practice.

("Smart safety systems = safer walking, less therapist fatigue.")

​

Q:13 Could an automated follow-chair improve gait training safety?

A13:

• Current Challenges:

  • Narrow corridors/crowded spaces limit mobility

  • Therapists manually push wheelchairs as safety backup (time-consuming)

  • Some patients reject traditional walking aids (prefer shopping trolleys for "normalcy")

• Proposed Solution:

  • Autonomous follow-chair (like luggage robots) with:

  • Distance sensors to avoid obstacles

  • Slow speed matching patient gait

  • Emergency stop function

• Key Considerations:

  • Must handle tight hospital spaces

  • Should feel "natural" (avoid medical stigma)

  • Fall detection/head protection features

• Why It Matters:

  • Reduces staff workload during corridor walks

  • Gives patients confidence to walk further

  • Blends into environment (like market trolleys)

  • "A smart follow-chair could bridge the gap between safety and independence in gait rehab."